Anyway, SafeMoon has been under the eyes of skepticism. Professionals say that it is an unpredictable business to put money into SafeMoon as it isn’t directed by using any particular means. It has been compared with a Ponzi Scheme as most liquidity is claimed by the group. SafeMoon has excused these cynics and has declared its precise path for the coming years. The group intends to coordinate SafeMoon with African Markets, investigate different trades like Binance, and even begin its own trade.
Leading crypto players in India likely to meet with Indian government next week to give inputs

Virtual currencies. Like fiat currency, virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ether are intended as a medium of exchange that enables two parties to transact business. But there are important differences: No physical coins or bills. Virtual currencies exist only in computer code. Except for visual representation of Bitcoin and altcoins in advertising and displays, and coin-like tokens that may be produced for marketing purposes, there are no actual coins or bills. Not legal tender. Virtual currencies are not legal tender and are not issued or backed by a government. However, many virtual currencies, which are called convertible virtual currencies, can be redeemed for fiat currency on a number of exchanges. No regulation. Virtual currencies are not regulated by any government agency or authority. However, regulation is being considered, especially where virtual currencies function as securities when they’re used to raise capital and when traded on exchanges.
It can be seen from Fig 6 that coherence in the short run is erratic throughout the time interval analysed, and that there is little appreciable difference between the bubble and non-bubble regimes. However in the medium term (8–16 and 16–32 days), coherence generally peaks around areas where bubbles have been identified in the price series. The longer term relationship, though, is less dependent on whether the price is in a bubble phase.