It can be observed that in the short term (2–4 and 4–8 day period band) there is no consistency in results; in some cases the null hypothesis can be rejected and in some cases it cannot. In the medium term there is more consistency in rejection of the null hypothesis in favour of bubble regime coherence values significantly exceeding the non-bubble regime values. In the long term, the proportion of instances exhibiting statistical significance reduces, with the majority of cases in the 256–512 band not being a rejection of the null hypothesis. This reduction of statistically significant differences when considering longer term periods further emphasises the point that it is the medium term in which coherences tend to strengthen during bubble regimes.
However, critics have noted that Ripple’s network and code are more susceptible to manipulation by sophisticated hackers and may not offer the same anonymity protections as Bitcoin-derived cryptocurrencies.

Another factor that crypto experts have mentioned regarding the competitiveness of the Safemoon coin is the speed of product release. Since the launch of the Safemoon token, only the Safemoon has been released. All other Safemoon products are in the development phase. This is not the case with the Safemoon coin contest, like Bitrise, which in short released several products, including a great dApp wallet.
"My advice to mainstream investors is to wait for the Certik audit (Q4 of 2021) and improvements in the liquidity pool before proceeding."