HomeCoronavirusCoronavirus HomeYour Coronavirus StoriesClimateVideoWorldWorld HomeAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaUKUK HomeEnglandN. IrelandScotlandWalesIsle of ManGuernseyJerseyLocal NewsBusinessBusiness HomeMarket DataNew EconomyNew Tech EconomyCompaniesEntrepreneurshipTechnology of BusinessEconomyCEO SecretsGlobal Car IndustryBusiness of SportTechScienceStoriesEntertainment & ArtsHealthHealth HomeCoronavirusIn PicturesReality CheckWorld News TVNewsbeatLong Reads
One example is the negative correlation that occurs between Ethereum and its associated factors around June 2016 (left facing arrows at the top and just left of the horizontal middle of the Ethereum scalograms). During this time interval, one of the most well-known applications at the time, the DAO, built on top of the Ethereum environment, was hacked. It can be seen that all factors are negatively correlated in the short term with the price during this time interval. As a result of the uncertainty generated by the hack, price dropped sharply, but activity on social media and interest increased (causing the negative correlation). The negative relationship can be seen during the 2–4 day band for all factors.

SafeMoon price struggles to establish a clear floor after pulling back nearly 50% from the all-time highs it established in late October. Last Friday showed some evidence that a continuation move higher may occur, but that quickly fizzled out.
When the spectre of restrictive regulation hovers over the cryptocurrency markets, steep drops invariably occur. If it happens to concern China or the US, brace yourself if you’re an investor—the market never stops trading, and what took months to build can crumble to nothing in an afternoon.